<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Ant Writes - Latest Comments</title><link>http://antwrites.disqus.com/</link><description>Wading through the swamp of Christianity</description><atom:link href="https://antwrites.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:38:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Evangelicals hate Jesus?</title><link>http://compuadept.net/wp/2011/03/12/evangelicals-hate-jesus-2/#comment-1001813533</link><description>&lt;p&gt;so giving all tax payers the same rights is spitting in Gods face...thank you for telling me that you want my money but I'm kess then you. peace.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:38:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NYC, the Mystery Babylon of the Bible?</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2011/09/16/nyc-the-mystery-babylon-of-the-bible/#comment-680500406</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, if this is true, then you may want to consider this.&lt;br&gt;Rev 18:4&lt;br&gt;  And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. &lt;br&gt;Jer 51:50&lt;br&gt;  Ye that have escaped the sword, go away, stand not still: remember the LORD afar off, and let Jerusalem come into your mind. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 00:01:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Israel and Judah Restored</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2012/09/26/israel-and-judah-restored/#comment-666525531</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your reply. You are correct, there is spiritual Israel (which the church is) but there is also physical Israel.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">antwrites</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:44:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Israel and Judah Restored</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2012/09/26/israel-and-judah-restored/#comment-665645983</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why then did Jesus choose twelve apostles, who were all Israelites? The Old Testament must be interepreted in the light of Christ, and all of its promises are fulfilled in him. (John 5:39-40; Luke 24:27; 2 Cor. 1:20; Gal. 3:16) Your interpretation rebuilds the wall of separation, which Christ, in his body tore down. (Ephesians 2:11-22)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Copley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:50:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Last Days</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2012/09/11/the-last-days/#comment-647478988</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's a wrong reading of the plain meaning of scripture. There are MANY prophecies in Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel that have yet to occur.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">antwrites</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 02:38:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Book Review: Destined for the Throne by Paul Billheimer</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2011/12/07/book-review-destined-for-the-throne-by-paul-billheimer/#comment-573382175</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Billheimer's "Destined for the Throne" is perhaps the most profound book I've ever read.  I was already familiar with the teachings of Paul and John regarding the significance of our union with God through Christ, but Billheimer's book was the first mainstream presentations of this awe-inspiring truth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would recommend, however, that you obtain a copy of the First Edition.  That is the distilled truth of Billheimer's discovery.  Subsequent editions are, sad to say, watered down considerably.  People drew back from accepting the scriptural teaching full strength.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, I believe that the first half of "Destined for the Throne" is a stand-alone work, and that the second half is only one application of the truth of our union with God through Christ.  The fact of the Church's fundamental union with God has many more implications than intercessory prayer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Finally, let me voice a serious objection to anyone who would take Billheimer's book as a justification for Dominionism or the idea of establishing a theocratic government based on the Bible.  If we are truly Christ-like, then we will be like our Master, who died an ignominious death on a cross, an apparent failure.  If Christians were meant to take the reigns of human government, then that's the example Jesus would have set, and he did not.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ronald Goetz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 03:31:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Pope&amp;#8217;s Office of Inquisition stresses that all Christians must be Catholic</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2012/01/10/the-popes-office-of-inquisition-stresses-that-all-christians-must-be-catholic/#comment-499665043</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good......I like an ambitious Catholic.  They are alive with zeal.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">la catholic state</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 05:51:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Judgement of Edom (Jordan)</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2012/02/15/judgement-of-edom-jordan/#comment-487135941</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ancient Edom was in Southern Jordan, but modern 'Edom' are the Ishmaelite [Islamic] peoples, those who hate My people. Ezekiel 35:1-14&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bruce McKerras</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 07:25:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who are my people?</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2012/02/03/who-are-my-people/#comment-429052510</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you so sure there will be a judgment day per se (in 2030)?  I was raised Catholic which would certainly imply i was indoctrinated with that sort of thing, and I still pray to Jesus, however the Jehovah's Witness literature i received said when Jesus was talking about "Hell", Hell was geographically near where Jesus lived (the translation for that word from aramaic), it was just the name of the local crematorium (a firepit where the dead bodies were burned).  When Jesus spoke of "eternal life" as opposed to "hell" he was literally saying your body wouldn't die and your body wouldn't be sent to the crematorium (fires of hell) - keeping in mind that the crematoriums were there for sanitary purposes (dead bodies spread disease as they decay).  To be honest, i do not know of any body that has been alive since Jesus' time on earth, but i could be wrong.  I don't mean to be anti or pro religious, i'm speaking literally from what i learned from seemingly accurate historical literature from, again, Jehovah's Witnesses.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobW</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:48:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My purpose&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2012/02/02/my-purpose/#comment-427960705</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks...this all started because of that Bauckham book !&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">antwrites</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:10:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My purpose&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2012/02/02/my-purpose/#comment-427695019</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like this purpose, and have seen your shift in focus over the past few weeks to this. This should lead to some good interaction for you. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Myers</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:20:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why we can not be in the millenium now</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2012/01/28/why-we-can-not-be-in-the-millenium-now/#comment-427462663</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Hi, thank you for commenting. I am aware that those verses don't specifically mention the Millenium, but what other period of time would they be referring to?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">antwrites</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:50:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why we can not be in the millenium now</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2012/01/28/why-we-can-not-be-in-the-millenium-now/#comment-426700738</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not an expert on this by any means, but you must be aware that the verses from the Old Testament that you are applying to the millennium are interpretations, not specifically cited as the millenium in passages themselves.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mscopley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:44:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Scarlet Worm in Psalm 22:6</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2012/01/21/the-scarlet-worm-in-psalm-226/#comment-418783164</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Indeed every page...every letter, every verse...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Littleguyintheeye</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:28:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Scarlet Worm in Psalm 22:6</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2012/01/21/the-scarlet-worm-in-psalm-226/#comment-417916607</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you..from you, that means a lot :)&lt;br&gt;I learned YEARS ago (NOT in seminary interestingly enough), to find the Messiah on every page. Even Leviticus :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">antwrites</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 01:58:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Scarlet Worm in Psalm 22:6</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2012/01/21/the-scarlet-worm-in-psalm-226/#comment-417334845</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post.  Its amazing how the Creator has left shadows of Messiah in every aspect of creation.  When reading this I was reminded of the verse:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Joh 6:51  I am the Living Bread that came down from Heaven. If anyone eats of this Bread, he will live forever. And indeed the bread which I will give is My flesh, which I will give for the life of the world. &lt;br&gt;Joh 6:52  Then the Jews argued with one another, saying, How can this One give us his flesh to eat? &lt;br&gt;Joh 6:53  Then Jesus said to them, Truly, truly, I say to you, Except you eat the flesh of the Son of Man, and drink His blood, you do not have life in yourselves. &lt;br&gt;Joh 6:54  The one partaking of My flesh and drinking of My blood has everlasting life, and I will raise him up at the last day. &lt;br&gt;Joh 6:55  For My flesh is truly food, and My blood is truly drink. &lt;br&gt;Joh 6:56  The one partaking of My flesh and drinking of My blood abides in Me, and I in him. &lt;br&gt;Joh 6:57  Even as the living Father sent Me, and I live through the Father; also the one partaking Me, even that one will live through Me. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Littleguyintheeye</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 05:37:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Must Read &amp;#8220;The Harbinger&amp;#8221; by Rabbi Jonathan Cahn [video]</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2012/01/08/must-read-the-harbinger-by-rabbi-jonathan-cahn-video/#comment-412919890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sure,it may be splitting hairs. I thought the book was astounding. Even if he's 100% wrong about G.W., everything else lines up. It's Cahn who made the error, not the Bible . plus, I realized that G.W. was a deist since it was the Age of Enlightenment and US was to be the first Masonic Republic. So I don't think G.W. was asking the God of Abraham for a blessing. But be that as it may. We weren't a blessed nation because of the Masonic founders, but DESPITE our Masonic founders. Our Puritan brothers prayed and asked for blessing 100 years before GW.&lt;br&gt;Thanks for reading and commenting!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">antwrites</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:14:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Must Read &amp;#8220;The Harbinger&amp;#8221; by Rabbi Jonathan Cahn [video]</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2012/01/08/must-read-the-harbinger-by-rabbi-jonathan-cahn-video/#comment-412912281</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I saw Mr. Cahn on the 700 club last week and bought the book later that day. The connections between the birth of America, its recent financial downfall, 911 and ancient Israel are simply astounding-- I encourage everyone to get a copy. But-- there are a few things I'd like to clarify. G. Washington was not inagurated at the chapel at ground zero, that took place at Federal Hall down the street-- the book says as much. What it says is that GW "consecrated" the US to God at the chapel. I searched high and low-- even sent the author a note-- without finding any other source that uses that term. I'm not saying it didn't happen-- but other descritions of the day simply say that the new president and company attended services-- celebrated etc. at ST. Pauls AFTER the inauguration ceremony. Also-- with any inspection of the neighborhood-- like google earth for instance, its clear that the chapel is at least adjacent to ground zero-- whether it was actually part of ground zero is hard to verify. There are a number of maps available that show the St. Pauls Chapel area in the 1770's before the land fill that formed ground zero was even there-- maybe this is just splitting hairs, but to be 100% you would have to ask the question if the church owned the beach property across the road. It also goes unstated about the origins of the sycamore tree that was toppled on 911. To best fit the Israeli analogy, it should have been planted sometime in the inauguration era-- but the book doesn't say. Also-- there are quite a few trees around the chapel, the book doesn't mention if there was anything unique about the one that was hit.    &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aeonyx</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:02:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Escape to Israel?</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2012/01/01/escape-to-israel/#comment-398639190</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is obvious that the enemies of Israel are preparing for a nuke &lt;br&gt;attack, but Bible prophecies say their weapons will be turned against &lt;br&gt;them. Obadiah 15; Deut 32:35&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Psalm 7:12-16 -&amp;gt; The enemy prepares his weapons and makes ready to attack. It is against&lt;br&gt; himself that his deadly shafts tipped with fire, will recoil upon. The &lt;br&gt;godless are in partnership with the devil, plotting mischief and &lt;br&gt;conceiving lies. They work hard at their plans to cause the downfall of &lt;br&gt;God's people, but what they have prepared will fall upon their own &lt;br&gt;heads.&lt;br&gt;				&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">antwrites</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 04:12:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Escape to Israel?</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2012/01/01/escape-to-israel/#comment-398617440</link><description>&lt;p&gt;After more praying and research, I've moved my original statement!&lt;br&gt;Thank you for replying&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">antwrites</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 02:20:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Escape to Israel?</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2012/01/01/escape-to-israel/#comment-398476241</link><description>&lt;p&gt;your comments on Ezekiel ch. 40-48 that they are not futuristic can be arguable. read this article. &lt;a href="http://bible.ucg.org/bible-commentary/Ezekiel/Description-of-the-millennial-temple-complex/default.aspx" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bible.ucg.org/bible-commentary/Ezekiel/Description-of-the-millennial-temple-complex/default.aspx"&gt;http://bible.ucg.org/bible-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Issahaddad99</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 18:55:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Escape to Israel?</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2012/01/01/escape-to-israel/#comment-398466517</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I understand Ezekiel 40-48 as the rebuilding of the temple in the Millinium kigdom. Why wouldn't be though? &lt;br&gt;First, the measurement of the temple is bigger that the ancient temple even the onle built by Herod. The Expositor's Bible Commentary has this to say on the matter:&lt;br&gt;"These chapters have been interpreted as referring to Solomon's temple, the temple of Zerubabbel (either real or proposed), Herod's temple, or a future temple in the Millennium or in the eternal state. Some, having difficulty understanding the passage when taken literally, interpret the section allegorically as teaching about the church and its earthly blessings and glories, while others understand the passage to symbolize the reality of the heavenly temple where Christ ministers today.&lt;br&gt;to read a somewhat defense of the future interpretation of this long section of Ezekiel read  this article: &lt;a href="http://bible.ucg.org/bible-commentary/Ezekiel/Description-of-the-millennial-temple-complex/default.aspx" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bible.ucg.org/bible-commentary/Ezekiel/Description-of-the-millennial-temple-complex/default.aspx"&gt;http://bible.ucg.org/bible-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good article though to interact with...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Issahaddad99</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 18:24:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tongues and Me</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2011/08/27/tongues-and-me/#comment-397592484</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for caring enug to send those links. I will read the main book you directed me to tonight. &lt;br&gt;I go back and forth with this. That was an older post (6 months). Having taught it and spoken in tongues myself, I wanted to be absolutely sure I was right. Reading "Destined for the Throne" got me back on the right track :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://antwrites.com/2011/12/07/book-review-destined-for-the-throne-by-paul-billheimer/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://antwrites.com/2011/12/07/book-review-destined-for-the-throne-by-paul-billheimer/"&gt;http://antwrites.com/2011/1...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">antwrites</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 17:51:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tongues and Me</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2011/08/27/tongues-and-me/#comment-397175663</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have found some pretty insightful book on tongues by Dave Roberson, &lt;a href="http://www.daveroberson.org/books.aspx?id=7#" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.daveroberson.org/books.aspx?id=7#"&gt;http://www.daveroberson.org...&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;'would be interested to hear your take.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pmaina</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 06:36:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thought for the Day</title><link>http://antwrites.com/2011/12/23/thought-for-the-day/#comment-395904022</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you and I agree. I'm glad you enjoy the blog! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">antwrites</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:50:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>